Pumping Up the Volume: Must-Have Outrageously Magnifying Mascaras

Achieving an intensely volumized glare is a long-pursued quest for most cosmetic-savvy women. Those who lack the lusciousness of naturally thick and dark lashes dream of that perfect dramatic look that caters an intensity boost or false lash effect. Finding that one and only holy-grail mascara that will outstrip all the rest can be tricky – admit it, you too have spent years in conquest – but is achievable nonetheless. And as mascara technology

expands, so does the quality of volumizing mascaras.

Yet the volume attribute alone has become quite passé over the past few years. A whole generation of mascaras that boasted a volumized effect, really didn’t live up to the hype. Manufacturers who acknowledged this became keener on creating all-in-one mascaras that offer multiple results and louder effects. Estee Lauder has recently added such a ‘new

generation’ mascara to its collection, Sumptuous Extreme . This mascara not only volumizes, but generates a multiple-lash effect thanks to the extension-like fibers it contains.

The Hypnôse series by Lancôme is also renowned for the combination of results it offers, hence why most of its mascaras are all-in-one go-tos. Doll Eyes is one of the frontrunners in the Hypnôse family, providing both lasting volume and a lift to

6 comments
Sort:
1 week ago

Schilling’s era was much more ofversife-oniented than Hershiser’s. His Arizona years were incredible. Schilling blows him away in Ks, WHIP and ERA+. And I don’t think it’s very reasonable (or realistic) to expect the voters to completely ignore postseason performance. Besides, Schilling is a far, far more deserving candidate than Mazeroski, who should not be in under an circumstances. Puckett is arguable. I suppose an argument can be made for Hershiser. But Schilling, like some others, is a special case because of how dominant he was at his peak. That’s a qualification for induction, as far as I’m concerned.

1 week ago

Schilling’s era was much more ofversife-oniented than Hershiser’s. His Arizona years were incredible. Schilling blows him away in Ks, WHIP and ERA+. And I don’t think it’s very reasonable (or realistic) to expect the voters to completely ignore postseason performance. Besides, Schilling is a far, far more deserving candidate than Mazeroski, who should not be in under an circumstances. Puckett is arguable. I suppose an argument can be made for Hershiser. But Schilling, like some others, is a special case because of how dominant he was at his peak. That’s a qualification for induction, as far as I’m concerned.

1 week ago

Que Rico! Quando era nina mi mama me compraba Durofrio de mantecado lo requerdo como si fuera ayer. Hace tiemto estoy atras de como se hace el mantecado. Voy aher esta receta a mi esroco.GpasiasDilia

1 week ago

We've arrvied at the end of the line and I have what I need!

1 week ago

We've arrvied at the end of the line and I have what I need!

4 weeks ago

wh0cd491694 <a href=http://viagra247.us.org/>viagra</a>

Knowledge is power!
Get Updates directly from L’Esthète
to your email!
Get the full experience by creating a Free Account today!
  • Add images to your L'Esthètes portfolio
  • Comment on your favorite articles
  • Find friends with similar interests
  • Contribute your own articles

By clicking Create, you accept L'Esthète's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

 
 
cancel
save

Forgot your password? Enter your username or e-mail address below? and we'll send you a link to change your password.

We just sent a verification code to your e-mail address

?>